the study involved two analyses: a comparison of adverse events between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, and between unvaccinated people infected with sars-cov-2 and unvaccinated noninfected people. by contrast, the risk of myocarditis was notably higher among infected but unvaccinated individuals, occurring at a rate of 11 excess cases per 100,000 people.
in an effort to provide the proper context that is critical for interpreting vaccine safety findings, the researchers also examine a wide range of adverse events both among vaccinated individuals and among unvaccinated individuals who were infected with the coronavirus, conducting two parallel analyses, assessing the occurrence of 25 adverse events in each of these groups. these events were observed mainly among males between the ages of 20 and 34. in contrast, myocarditis was far more common among unvaccinated individuals infected with sars-cov-2.
there has been much social media chatter about some harvard pilgrim study and how it found that vaccine adverse events and deaths are underreported by a factor of 100. as a litigator in the vaccine field, this is something i have come across and have used, so i thought it might be helpful to some readers to post the study, and maybe clear-up some misimpressions in circulation. so to my mind, making the argument that covid vaccine deaths are underreported by a factor of a hundred based on this study is both unjustified and ridiculous on its face. and this is all when most of the 42 million vaccinated have only received one of the two doses. myriad of chronic health issues now an epidemic in the usa, are linked to injections and other pharmaceuticals. i would like to add what i think is a crucial point: the harvard pilgrim “study” was not a study of vaers reporting rates. even the 95% claim should be researched closer by those who are interest because it is not as it seem, it’s a relative number of improved protection as opposed to the placebo group. i think there are many reasons ae’s are underreported for drugs and vaccines, but my uninformed guess is that a big reason is that ae’s include local and mild, which really don’t affect the safety or determination of whether to give a drug or vaccine, because all medical interventions can cause some mild side effect is some people. when you are told the side effects are likely to be fever chills, aches, sore arm headaches and more then why would anyone report it unless in a trial. the only side effect that can be easily linked to a vaccine is anaphylaxis, because usually it happens within 30 minutes after injection. the real takeaway from harvard pilgrim is that they showed how to make a more reliable system for showing adverse events and they blew them off. as i mentioned…even the now 15,000+ deaths that are reported is a crazy number. the best way for us to get a sense of the actual tool is from analysis of other markers, such as national rates of myocrditis, and total death rates.
this is an excellent point that i think much of the media and even folks like richard seem to ignore. if they would not have this immunity of liability, and would like be responsible for the serious side effects (not talking about a sore arm here or a bit of tiredness, but other severe damages as reported by vaers) the pharma’s would never bring it to market. i took my best shot at running actual numbers, using an estimate of the number of “at least 3,454,269,356 vaccine doses” administered in the us from 2006-17 from a vax shill site (/2018/01/10/vaccines-statistics-and-numbers/), and a vaers search for all us adverse events reported to have occurred within the same period, and came up with an underreporting factor of 233 for all adverse events. i think the real problem is that the government doesn’t/won’t give out that data and that there is no incentive to look for it, because it will be used by so called anti vaxxers to support their rejection of it. i’d expect approximately the same number to be there if we monitored adverse events of a glass of water. if everyone who was going to gravely sicken and die as a result of the vaccine did so with dramatic immediacy, i am sure we would be seeing more reports of adverse events as stemming from the vaccine. “i do not know of any data that would allow a reasonable statement to be made here and i do not start from an unreported number,” said the head of the standing vaccination commission, thomas mertens. this is the only way to exclude or prove connections between deaths and vaccinations, says johannes friemann, head of the autopsy working group in the association. this is a wonderful thread of what seems to be very investigative individuals. take a look at the conditions for licensure that are attached to biontech comirnaty. thank you for clarifying my understanding of the foundation of this study and acknowledging there are conflicts of interest in the overall system. yes, very troubling that there does not seem to be proper investigation of the vaers reported deaths and other saes.
data is presented by year and is divided into three subcategories. vaers data includes information about the patient’s demographics, and data related to their 74. because vaers is a passive reporting system, many adverse reactions to vac- cines may not be reported.75 moreover, the department of health and human. yet, with sporadic reports of rare adverse events, one question has remained unanswered: just how safe are covid-19 vaccines in the real, harvard study on covid vaccine side effects, harvard pilgrim study, harvard pilgrim study, vaers only 1 percent reported, vaers underreporting study.
(prepared by harvard pilgrim health care, inc. under grant no. r18 hs017045). rockville, md: agency for healthcare research and quality, 2010. pdf. when the vaccine adverse event reporting system (vaers) was established in 1990, its creators at the food and drug administration (fda) and dr. marie mccormick of the harvard medical school and school of public by cdc and fda was created, the vaccine adverse event reporting system (vaers)., electronic support for public health–vaccine adverse event reporting system (esp:vaers), medical journal covid vaccine long-term effects, harvard study on covid antibodies, vaers id lookup, vaers 1166062, medical journal covid vaccine side effects, vaers i.d. 1225942 1, vaers id 966236, vaers 966236, http www healthfreedomiowa org articles fewer than 1 of vaccine reactions are being reported.
When you try to get related information on harvard vaers report, you may look for related areas. harvard study on covid vaccine side effects, harvard pilgrim study, vaers only 1 percent reported, vaers underreporting study, electronic support for public health–vaccine adverse event reporting system (esp:vaers), medical journal covid vaccine long-term effects, harvard study on covid antibodies, vaers id lookup, vaers 1166062, medical journal covid vaccine side effects, vaers i.d. 1225942 1, vaers id 966236, vaers 966236, http www healthfreedomiowa org articles fewer than 1 of vaccine reactions are being reported.